search

Shintaro Imai vs Matic Spec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Imai vs Spec analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Shintaro Imai vs Matic Spec Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Imai 1 - 0 Spec

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Imai has won 48.96% of points on their second serve, while Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Imai, in recent form, has won 49.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.15% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Imai has saved 59.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Imai has won 54.84% of matches played (W/L 17/ 14), with Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Imai has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 80% (W/L 4/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2). Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59).
  • Player level: In the last year, Imai has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 12/ 9), where as Spec has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Imai winning 1 times and Spec being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Imai winning 2 and Spec winning 0. The last match between Imai and Spec was at the Thailand F4 (Hua Hin), 24-09-2018, First, Hard with Shintaro Imai getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Imai and Spec have played a deciding set 0 times, with Imai winning 0 times and Spec 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Imai winning 1, and Spec 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Imai has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.68 while Spec has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Imai has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Imai has converted 44.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Shintaro Imai

12

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

12

Minor

581

Rank

290

High

30

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

819

Rank

710

High

29

Age

Plays

Matic Spec

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L W L W L L L L

Form

L L W L L W L W W L

63% (282-166)

Career Total W/L

64% (167-95)

55% (12-10)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Shintaro Imai vs Matic Spec For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Imai VS Spec H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Shintaro Imai Matic Spec
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 13 9
Aces (Total) 3 2
DFs (Total) 4 4
Avg Match Time 2:29:0 2:29:0
1st Serve % 55% (46/83) 57% (46/80)
1st Serve Win% 65% (30/46) 65% (30/46)
2nd Serve Win% 49% (18/37) 38% (13/34)
BPs Won% (Total) 36% (4/11) 50% (3/6)
Return Points W% 46% (37/80) 42% (35/83)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Imai VS Spec H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-6(4) 6-3
cross
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matic Spec
55% ( 46 of 83)
1st Serve %
58% ( 46 of 80)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65% ( 30 of 46)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 30 of 46)
49% ( 18 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 13 of 34)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
42% ( 35 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 37 of 80)
85
Total Points Won
78

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Shintaro Imai Matic Spec
YTD W/L 55% (12/10) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 55% (31/25) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 51% (277/269) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 53% (9/8) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 60% (3/2) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.51 0
Aces Total 136 0
DFs per game 0.19 0
DFs Total 51 0
Avg Match Time 2:5:9 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 295.86 0
1st Serve % 61% (1087/1782) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 71% (772/1087) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 49% (340/695) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 45% (60/134) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 38% (644/1691) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 50% (5/5) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 58% (7/5) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 55% (12/22) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 75% (6/8) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 42% (5/12) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 69% (13/9) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 31% (13/4) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 33% (9/3) 0% (0/0)

Shintaro Imai Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Shintaro Imai
54% ( 49 of 91)
1st Serve %
50% ( 45 of 90)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71% ( 35 of 49)
1st Serve Won
84% ( 38 of 45)
50% ( 21 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 20 of 45)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
18% ( 2 of 11)
38% ( 35 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 32 of 90)
88
Total Points Won
93
L
6-4 1-6 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Rudy Quan
Player
Shintaro Imai
72% ( 55 of 76)
1st Serve %
46% ( 54 of 118)
0
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
9
65% ( 36 of 55)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 34 of 54)
48% ( 10 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 29 of 64)
32% ( 6 of 19)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
39% ( 30 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 55 of 118)
101
Total Points Won
93
L
4-6 6-4 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61% ( 54 of 89)
1st Serve %
62% ( 48 of 77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72% ( 39 of 54)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 32 of 48)
49% ( 17 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 14 of 29)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
37% ( 33 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 31 of 77)
87
Total Points Won
79
L
2-6 6-3 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Blake Mott
Player
Shintaro Imai
72% ( 71 of 98)
1st Serve %
63% ( 61 of 97)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
59% ( 42 of 71)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 35 of 61)
56% ( 15 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 9 of 36)
67% ( 8 of 12)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
42% ( 41 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 53 of 97)
110
Total Points Won
85
L
6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Shintaro Imai
Player
Daniel Little
64% ( 38 of 59)
1st Serve %
62% ( 37 of 60)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
82% ( 31 of 38)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 26 of 37)
57% ( 12 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 9 of 23)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
27% ( 16 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 25 of 60)
68
Total Points Won
51
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Blake Mott
Player
Shintaro Imai
80% ( 73 of 91)
1st Serve %
65% ( 78 of 120)
3
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
71% ( 52 of 73)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 54 of 78)
44% ( 8 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 16 of 42)
24% ( 4 of 17)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
34% ( 31 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 50 of 120)
110
Total Points Won
101
L
4-6 7-5 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Shintaro Imai
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63% ( 57 of 90)
1st Serve %
68% ( 61 of 90)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
67% ( 38 of 57)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 39 of 61)
48% ( 16 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 14 of 29)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
40% ( 36 of 90)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 37 of 90)
91
Total Points Won
89
W
6-4 3-6 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Sora Fukuda
Player
Shintaro Imai
73% ( 33 of 45)
1st Serve %
59% ( 23 of 39)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82% ( 27 of 33)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 12 of 23)
33% ( 4 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 4 of 16)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
31% ( 14 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 23 of 39)
54
Total Points Won
30
L
6-2 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Shintaro Imai
Player
Leo Vithoontien
67% ( 33 of 49)
1st Serve %
64% ( 37 of 58)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79% ( 26 of 33)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 23 of 37)
69% ( 11 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 11 of 21)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 12 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 24 of 58)
61
Total Points Won
46
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Shintaro Imai
Player
Kokoro Isomura
53% ( 31 of 59)
1st Serve %
49% ( 21 of 43)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 12 of 21)
64% ( 18 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 13 of 22)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
29% ( 17 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 18 of 43)
60
Total Points Won
42
W
6-3 6-2 H2H

Matic Spec Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63% ( 63 of 100)
1st Serve %
64% ( 59 of 92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65% ( 41 of 63)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 34 of 59)
46% ( 17 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 12 of 33)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
23% ( 3 of 13)
42% ( 42 of 100)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 46 of 92)
104
Total Points Won
88
L
4-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61% ( 55 of 90)
1st Serve %
66% ( 49 of 74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60% ( 33 of 55)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 31 of 49)
60% ( 21 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 14 of 25)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
80% ( 4 of 5)
40% ( 36 of 90)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 29 of 74)
83
Total Points Won
81
W
1-6 7-5 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61% ( 59 of 97)
1st Serve %
58% ( 62 of 107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61% ( 36 of 59)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 35 of 62)
50% ( 19 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 21 of 45)
35% ( 6 of 17)
Break Points Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
43% ( 42 of 97)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 51 of 107)
106
Total Points Won
98
W
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) H2H
R2
cross
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63% ( 42 of 67)
1st Serve %
70% ( 58 of 83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81% ( 34 of 42)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 41 of 58)
80% ( 20 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
64% ( 16 of 25)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
19% ( 13 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
31% ( 26 of 83)
80
Total Points Won
70
L
3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59% ( 60 of 102)
1st Serve %
69% ( 63 of 91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63% ( 38 of 60)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 42 of 63)
48% ( 20 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 7 of 28)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
43% ( 44 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 42 of 91)
100
Total Points Won
93
W
6-2 5-7 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75% ( 30 of 40)
1st Serve %
67% ( 41 of 61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77% ( 23 of 30)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 23 of 41)
60% ( 6 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
28% ( 11 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 32 of 61)
61
Total Points Won
40
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61% ( 46 of 75)
1st Serve %
78% ( 74 of 95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74% ( 34 of 46)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 49 of 74)
69% ( 20 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 11 of 21)
25% ( 2 of 8)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
28% ( 21 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 35 of 95)
89
Total Points Won
81
L
7-5 7-6(7) H2H
Q2
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61% ( 31 of 51)
1st Serve %
59% ( 37 of 63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74% ( 23 of 31)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 26 of 37)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 8 of 26)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
31% ( 16 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 29 of 63)
64
Total Points Won
50
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
L
7-6(5) 6-2 H2H

Imai Vs Spec Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Imai are available here and Spec photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions